Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 15. Dec 2024, 21:35:48
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <852f35e61c9f82a8f3191449358705068e71f617@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sun, 15 Dec 2024 12:12:13 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 15.12.2024 11:51, Mikko wrote:
On 2024-12-14 21:40:48 +0000, WM said:
In a geometry where all points exist, all points can be passed.
Yes but none of them can be passed before passing other points.
That contradicts the actual existence of all.
On the contrary. The density of the points prevents passing them.
When other points are passed, the former has been passed before.
Otherwise it would not be the former.
When. This goes for all points, so none can actually be passed.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers