Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/16/24 3:50 AM, WM wrote:

On 15.12.2024 22:13, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/15/24 1:57 PM, WM wrote:

 

>
Dark numbers are required to empty ℕ by |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ...}| = 0. All definable numbers fail: ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.

 

And why do you need to do that?

 In order to show the existence of dark numbers.
 Regards, WM
 

In other words, you ADMIT to creating strawmen for your nefarious purpose.
The problem is your "dark numbers" don't exist in the domain you claim them to, and your "proof" is based on looking at the black hole that results from the supernova explosion of your logic system that has blown itself into smithereens from its inconsistencies from assuming that infinites work just like finites.
That is the flaw of your naive math theory that you have made up.