Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 17.12.2024 11:07, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM wrote :

On 17.12.2024 00:52, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/16/24 3:30 AM, WM wrote:

On 15.12.2024 21:21, joes wrote:

>

Therefore we use all [1, n].

Those are all finite.

All n are finite.

But N isn't, so the sets [1, n] aren't what the bijection is defined
on.

Every element is the last element of a FISON [1, n].

Why does your FISON look like a real interval?

Originally I had used unit intervals [n, n+1] of real intervals (0,
10n]. The argument remains the same.