Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 17. Dec 2024, 22:46:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjsrg0$1tr00$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 17.12.2024 12:14, joes wrote:
Am Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:37:13 +0100 schrieb WM:

You don’t. You only ever apply a finite number (except in the limit).
I apply all natural numbers k ∈ ℕ which Cantor applies. In both cases there is no limit.

Cantor
applies only finite k and claims that none remains unused (as the
content of all endsegments).
Cantor applies the infinite set.
How would he apply the infinite set? Please explain why you think that he applies more than all k ∈ ℕ.
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Dec 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6joes
15 Dec 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
15 Dec 24  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
16 Dec 24   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
17 Dec 24    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
17 Dec 24     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal