Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 18. Dec 2024, 20:14:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjv6uv$2dra0$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 18.12.2024 19:22, Jim Burns wrote:
On 12/18/2024 7:40 AM, WM wrote:
The infinite end.segments of finite.cardinals
do not include any finite end.segments and
they have an empty intersection.
>
Explicitly wrong.
As long as only infinite endsegments are concerned their intersection is infinite.
>
There are no limits involved.
Then it would be great if you (WM)
stopped calling things 'limit sets'
The sets described here are not limit sets.
f(k) = ∩{E(1), E(2), ..., E(k)} with E(1) = ℕ
∀k ∈ ℕ : ∩{E(1), E(2), ..., E(k+1)} = ∩{E(1), E(2), ..., E(k)} \ {k},
∩{E(1), E(2), ...} is empty.
Other sets are not in the argument.
Regards, WM