Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 22.12.2024 13:28, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/21/24 12:46 PM, WM wrote:

On 21.12.2024 04:37, Richard Damon wrote:
>

His problem is he isn't using the actual set of Natural Numbers, only a FISON of 1 to n,

And you don't use ALL natural numbers, as you logic doesn't allow you to do the needed infiite operations to use ALL, only ANY,

You don't understand that.

 No FISION uses ALL the Natural Numbers,

Find a natural number that is not in all intervals [1, n] which I use:
∀n ∈ ℕ [1, n].
Regards, WM