Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/22/24 8:11 AM, WM wrote:

On 22.12.2024 13:28, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/21/24 12:46 PM, WM wrote:

On 21.12.2024 04:37, Richard Damon wrote:
>

His problem is he isn't using the actual set of Natural Numbers, only a FISON of 1 to n,

 

And you don't use ALL natural numbers, as you logic doesn't allow you to do the needed infiite operations to use ALL, only ANY,

 You don't understand that.

No, *YOU* don't understad what you are talking about, because you mind is just too small to understand how the infinite works,

>
No FISION uses ALL the Natural Numbers,

 Find a natural number that is not in all intervals [1, n] which I use:
∀n ∈ ℕ [1, n].

But you can't use *ALL* intervals, becaue you need to use them individually and have a finite rate of action,
You logic only work if there is a "highest" natural number, if you can really use *ALL* the natural numbers, then you can remove all the elements.
Your problem is your logic can't do all of an infinite set, so never had the natural numbers to begin with.
Any number you have left is just proof that you didn't remove *ALL* the intervals, and thus shows that you are just a stupid liar.

 Regards, WM