Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 12/23/2024 3:56 PM, Moebius wrote:For all x e IR (and hence for all x e IN): 0 + x = x.Am 24.12.2024 um 00:49 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:DoesOn 12/23/2024 6:32 AM, Richard Damon wrote:>On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:>On 23.12.2024 02:01, Richard Damon wrote:>On 12/22/24 5:11 PM, WM wrote:>On 22.12.2024 20:10, Richard Damon wrote:On 12/22/24 8:11 AM, WM wrote:>>Find a natural number that is not in all intervals [1, n] which I use: ∀n ∈ ℕ [1, n].>
But you can't use *ALL* intervals, becaue you need to use them individually
No, I do as Cantor did.No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,>
Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].
The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.
LOL! n+1?
>
Am I close here? Or way off?
Yeah, you are close to the edge.
>
See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51oPKLSuyQY
{ 0, 1, 2, 3, ...}
equal:
{ 0 + 0, 0 + 1, 0 + 2, 0 + 3, ... }
Does WM mean ...Actually, I'm not interested in anything this asshole full of shit means or doesn't mean, sorry.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.