Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 23.12.2024 15:32, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/23/24 4:31 AM, WM wrote:

No, I do as Cantor did.

>

No, you do what you THINK Cantor did,

>
Show an n that I do not use with all intervals [1, n].

The LAST one, which you say must exist to use your logic.

I do what Cantor did. There is no last one. You cannot show an n that I do not use. There is none. Therefore all your arguing breaks down.
Regards, WM