Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 26. Dec 2024, 20:59:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <7e25ac37189fd360d7a891cf752b62825542dc7b@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sat, 21 Dec 2024 18:46:47 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 21.12.2024 04:37, Richard Damon wrote:
His problem is he isn't using the actual set of Natural Numbers, only a
FISON of 1 to n,
Wrong. I am using all FISONs. No natural number remains unused.
False. All FISONs are finite.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.