Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 12/28/24 11:50 AM, WM wrote:

On 12/27/2024 01:00 PM, Jim Burns wrote:

"almost all" does _not_ equate to "all".

Actually, in the context of analysis "almost all" usually means: "all but finitely many" (and "all" here usually refers to infinitely many <whatever>).

A good example [are the endsegments]. Every [endsegment] contains ["all but finitely many"] [aka "almost all"] natural numbers.

Mückenheim's brain is negligible small.
.
.
.