Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 29. Dec 2024, 02:59:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vkqaem$kiin$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 29.12.2024 um 01:55 schrieb Moebius:
Am 29.12.2024 um 01:48 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
Say, 1875520200019832...
>
Each digit is random. This [represents] a number and it's within the infinite set of unsigned integers.
Nope. Such a "number" is not an integer.
Hint: Each and every "unsigned" integer has to be "represented" by a finite (!) string of digits.
You see:
0, 1, 2, 3, ..., 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, ..., 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, ... (and so on)
.
.
.