Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

Am 29.12.2024 um 03:07 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 12/28/2024 5:58 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 29.12.2024 um 01:48 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>

Say, 1875520200019832...
>
Each digit is random. This [represents] a number and it's within the infinite set of unsigned integers.

>
Nope. Such a "number" is not an integer.

 It's an unsigned integer at every step?

Sure.
For each and every n e IN: The string
       d_n d_(n-1) ... d_1
where d_i e {"0", "1", ..., "9"} for all i e {1, ..., n} represents an unsigned integer.
Simple as that.
.
.
.