Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

Am 29.12.2024 um 01:48 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
>

Say, 1875520200019832...
 Each digit is random. This [represents] a number and it's within the infinite set of unsigned integers.

>
Nope. Such a "number" is not an integer.
>
Hint: Each and every "unsigned" (i.e. non-negative) integer has to be "represented" by a finite (!) string of digits.
>
.
.
.