Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 12/29/24 6:01 AM, WM wrote:

On 28.12.2024 20:17, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/28/24 11:50 AM, WM wrote:

 

Every Natural Number is less that almost all other natural numbers, so its %-tile of progress is effectively 0, but together they make up the whole infinite set.

 All definable numbers (FISONs) stay below 1 %. Every union of "below 1 %" stays below 1 %.
 Regards, WM

Since 0 is Less than 1, you are sort of correct, but that fact doesn't prove your claim.
The problem is that when you get to *ALL* you are now talking abut infinite mathematics, which your logic just can't handle, because you, a finite being, can't do all of an infinite set individually, so it isn;t something you can talk about.