Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 29. Dec 2024, 15:43:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <cb53956e1b9f9f294eabe4bb2931aec79af363ad@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sun, 29 Dec 2024 12:05:26 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 28.12.2024 20:35, joes wrote:
Am Sat, 28 Dec 2024 14:58:50 +0100 schrieb WM:
 
Therefore the union of all of them contains less than half of all
natural numbers.
Worng.
My theorem: If all definable numbers (FISONs) stay below a certain
threshold, then every union of those FISONs stays below that threshold.
The infinite union doesn’t.

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Dec 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)134joes
15 Dec 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)133WM
15 Dec 24  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)132joes
16 Dec 24   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)131WM
16 Dec 24    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14joes
16 Dec 24    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13WM
16 Dec 24    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12joes
16 Dec 24    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11WM
16 Dec 24    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10joes
17 Dec 24    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9WM
17 Dec 24    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
17 Dec 24    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
18 Dec 24    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5joes
18 Dec 24    i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
18 Dec 24    i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
19 Dec 24    i       i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
26 Dec 24    i       i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
18 Dec 24    i       `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
17 Dec 24    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)116Richard Damon
17 Dec 24     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
17 Dec 24     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)114WM
17 Dec 24      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3FromTheRafters
17 Dec 24      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
17 Dec 24      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
17 Dec 24      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51Richard Damon
17 Dec 24      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50WM
18 Dec 24      i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48Chris M. Thomasson
28 Dec 24      i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)47Moebius
28 Dec 24      i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)27Moebius
28 Dec 24      i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)26Moebius
29 Dec 24      i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)25WM
29 Dec23:15      i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)24Chris M. Thomasson
29 Dec23:45      i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)23Moebius
30 Dec09:40      i    i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19WM
30 Dec21:28      i    i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18joes
30 Dec22:53      i    i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17WM
31 Dec09:56      i    i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16joes
31 Dec10:39      i    i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)15WM
1 Jan14:54      i    i    i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
1 Jan15:47      i    i    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13FromTheRafters
2 Jan12:52      i    i    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
2 Jan14:26      i    i    i      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Richard Damon
2 Jan14:49      i    i    i      i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
2 Jan18:28      i    i    i      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
2 Jan20:47      i    i    i      i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Richard Damon
3 Jan09:47      i    i    i      i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
3 Jan13:28      i    i    i      i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
3 Jan15:55      i    i    i      i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
2 Jan14:43      i    i    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
3 Jan02:37      i    i    i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
3 Jan02:45      i    i    i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
3 Jan12:21      i    i    i         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
31 Dec06:08      i    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Moebius
31 Dec10:36      i    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
31 Dec16:49      i    i      `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
28 Dec 24      i    i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i    ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
28 Dec 24      i    ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
28 Dec 24      i    i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
28 Dec 24      i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)14WM
28 Dec 24      i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)13joes
29 Dec 24      i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)12WM
29 Dec 24      i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)11joes
29 Dec18:56      i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
29 Dec19:50      i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
29 Dec23:24      i        i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
29 Dec19:15      i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Ross Finlayson
29 Dec21:34      i         +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5Jim Burns
29 Dec21:57      i         i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Ross Finlayson
29 Dec22:48      i         i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Jim Burns
30 Dec02:17      i         i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Ross Finlayson
30 Dec18:23      i         i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Jim Burns
29 Dec21:51      i         `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
17 Dec 24      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)59joes
17 Dec 24       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)58WM
18 Dec 24        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)57Richard Damon
18 Dec 24         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)56WM
18 Dec 24          +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3joes
19 Dec 24          i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2WM
26 Dec 24          i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
19 Dec 24          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)52Richard Damon
19 Dec 24           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51WM
19 Dec 24            +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
20 Dec 24            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49Richard Damon
20 Dec 24             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48WM
20 Dec 24              +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)46Chris M. Thomasson
20 Dec 24              i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)45WM
20 Dec 24              i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)44Chris M. Thomasson
21 Dec 24              i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43Richard Damon
21 Dec 24              i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
21 Dec 24              i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
21 Dec 24              i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)40WM
22 Dec 24              i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)38Richard Damon
22 Dec 24              i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)37WM
22 Dec 24              i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)36Richard Damon
22 Dec 24              i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)35WM
23 Dec 24              i    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)34Richard Damon
23 Dec 24              i    i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
23 Dec 24              i    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)32WM
26 Dec 24              i    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
26 Dec 24              `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal