Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 12/29/24 12:48 PM, WM wrote:

On 29.12.2024 13:31, Richard Damon wrote:
 

NBo, you "Naive" (which you call straight) mathematics just can't handle this sort of math,

 My theorem: Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold stays below that threshold.
Find a counterexample. Don't claim it but prove it. Fail.
Contradicting this theorem without reason is outside of mathematics.
 Regards, WM
 

But what does that prove?
The finite numbers are finite, and that is it.
Your logic just can't handle "infinite" things, even though you may try.
Your trying just shows you don't even understand how your own logic works, because you are just to ignorant.
You are just proving your stupidity.