Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 12/29/24 12:53 PM, WM wrote:

On 29.12.2024 13:34, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/29/24 6:01 AM, WM wrote:

 

>
All definable numbers (FISONs) stay below 1 %. Every union of "below 1 %" stays below 1 %.

>
Since 0 is Less than 1, you are sort of correct, but that fact doesn't prove your claim.
>
The problem is that when you get to *ALL*

 I get to all FISONs below a certain threshold, namely a threshold between which and ω there exist ℵ₀ natnumbers.
 Regards, WM
  

Which isn't "All FISONs" so it says nothing about the infinite set.
It seems you mind just has a blnd spot to infinity.
Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity.