Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

Am Mon, 30 Dec 2024 09:50:26 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 30.12.2024 01:39, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/29/24 12:53 PM, WM wrote:

On 29.12.2024 13:34, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/29/24 6:01 AM, WM wrote:

>
>

All definable numbers (FISONs) stay below 1 %. Every union of "below
1 %" stays below 1 %.

>

Since 0 is Less than 1, you are sort of correct, but that fact
doesn't prove your claim.
The problem is that when you get to *ALL*

>
I get to all FISONs below a certain threshold, namely a threshold
between which and ω there exist ℵ₀ natnumbers.

So not all. All those thresholds (and the FISONs) are finite and do not
include all naturals.
 

Which isn't "All FISONs"

Do you personally know FISONs larger than those? Please let me know
them.

threshold +1