Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 31.12.2024 06:08, Moebius wrote:

 Andernfalls handelt es sich lediglich um unbewiesene und oft genug auch falsche Behauptungen (so wie in diesem Fall)
 

For each and every FISON F: F c_strict (WM: "below") IN. But the union of all FISONs is not c_strict (WM: "below") IN but = IN.

Yes. Only a real fool could claim that by unioning the gap between less than 1 % and ℕ could be closed.
Every FISON is less than 1 % of ℕ because by expanding it by a factor 100 the situations remains the same - forever.
Gruß, WM