Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 12/31/24 1:08 PM, WM wrote:

On 31.12.2024 16:39, Richard Damon wrote:
 

All you have proved is that any finite set has a maximum value, while the INFINITE set of Natural Numbers (or FISONs) do not, and thus your logic can't talk about "all".

 The set of natural numbers in FISONs is finite because it is the union of FISONs.
Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold stays below that threshold. Every FISON is finite.
 Regards, WM
 

So, all you are showing is that finite sets are finite, but then you illogically claim that what holds for a finite set, must also hold for an infinite set, but it doesn't.
Sorry, you are just proving your own utter stupidity, because you mind is just to small to understand that it is just too small and closes its eyes (and thus creates your darkness, but only in your own mind) that is nothing but your ignorance shining through.