Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Jan 2025, 14:46:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <cdd09e00bcb231094252f497653bbdd9fffef5d5@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 31 Dec 2024 19:08:38 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 31.12.2024 16:39, Richard Damon wrote:
All you have proved is that any finite set has a maximum value, while
the INFINITE set of Natural Numbers (or FISONs) do not, and thus your
logic can't talk about "all".
The set of natural numbers in FISONs is finite because it is the union
of FISONs.
omgwtf
There are infinitely many FISONs, one for every natural. N is the
infinite union.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.