Sujet : Re: There is a first/smallest integer (in Mückenland)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Jan 2025, 19:01:37
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <HiCdnXFf74pnH-j6nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 07/17/2024 10:13 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM presented the following explanation :
Le 17/07/2024 à 15:42, FromTheRafters a écrit :
Moebius presented the following explanation :
WM> All unit fractions are separated. Therefore there is a first one
>
Moebius> All integers are separated. Therefore there is a first one [?]
>
WM> This is true but difficult to understand.
>
Perhaps, with professional counseling,
>
you could explain how NUF(x) can increase from 0 to many more in one
point although all unit fractions are separated by finite distances?
>
Sure, it jumps because of your stepwise function.
Re: There is a first/smallest integer (in Mückenland)