Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 02. Jan 2025, 20:47:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <2aefc2df43f7a5dfe9f7ba194adbc87ff9f586c1@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/2/25 12:18 PM, WM wrote:
On 02.01.2025 14:22, Richard Damon wrote:
On 1/2/25 6:36 AM, WM wrote:
On 01.01.2025 03:03, Richard Damon wrote:
>
Yes, SOME of the properties of the set come from properties of its members,
>
What property does not?
Like being infinite.
Mistake. An infinite set needs infinitely many elements.
Regards, WM
Which it does. There are an infinite number of finite numbers.
I guess you are admitting to your stupidity.
(F you think there are only a finite number of Natural Numbers, then what is that number?
What every you want to say, why is that + 1 a number, and thus there are more Natural Numbers then you think.