Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 03. Jan 2025, 13:24:54
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <ea5058072d964266359aad3b17487b076765d9e7@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 02 Jan 2025 18:18:04 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 02.01.2025 14:22, Richard Damon wrote:
On 1/2/25 6:36 AM, WM wrote:
On 01.01.2025 03:03, Richard Damon wrote:
>
Yes, SOME of the properties of the set come from properties of its
members,
What property does not?
Like being infinite.
Mistake. An infinite set needs infinitely many elements.
…which don’t need to be infinite themselves. QED.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.