Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 1/3/25 3:52 AM, WM wrote:

On 03.01.2025 02:52, Moebius wrote:
>

Nope. For each and every FISON F: F c IN.
>
But UNION(Set_of_FISONs) = IN.

>
Every union of FISONs including them all which stay below a certain threshold stays below that threshold.
>
Regards, WM
>

 Which is different from *ALL* of them, which =your logic can't do, and thus shows you are just a stupid idiot that just doesn't understand the infinite.