Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)

On 1/3/25 12:13 PM, WM wrote:

On 03.01.2025 15:50, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/3/25 3:52 AM, WM wrote:

On 03.01.2025 02:52, Moebius wrote:
>

Nope. For each and every FISON F: F c IN.
>
But UNION(Set_of_FISONs) = IN.

>
Every union of FISONs including them all which stay below a certain threshold stays below that threshold.

 

Which is different from *ALL* of them,

 No. ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
 Regards, WM
 

So, you just confirm your stupidity.
You don't seem to know what *ALL* means, and you are unable to define what the difference between N and N_def is.
You are just confirming you are nothing but an ignorant liar that doesn't know enough to know he is jsut stupid.