Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, effectively)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 04. Jan 2025, 11:59:47
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <a676a0802d5bdf15dd22a1f8cd5072893b6e1e33@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sat, 04 Jan 2025 09:52:08 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 04.01.2025 05:06, Richard Damon wrote:
On 1/3/25 12:15 PM, WM wrote:
Every union of FISONs which stay below a certain threshold stays below
that threshold.
Every union of a finite number of FISONs is just an admssion that you
can't do the actual union of *ALL* FISONs.
For all FISONs:|ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.
But not for the union.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.