Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : FTR (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Jan 2025, 22:51:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Peripheral Visions
Message-ID : <vlhj98$1qnj9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
WM presented the following explanation :
On 06.01.2025 19:23, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM pretended :
0 is a cardinal but not an ordinal.
Wrong.
>
Who is the zeroest clown?
Okay, maybe not with "your" definition of the ordinal numbers. This is mathematics, and you just revealed yet another concept which you misunderstand.