Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 1/7/2025 2:08 AM, WM wrote:

On 07.01.2025 01:47, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

He is hyper finite, and that's the way it is.

 I am using logic with actual infinity |ℕ| which is a fixed quantity larger than every n by every finite factor, for instance 100.
Every union of FISONs {1, 2, 3, ..., n} which stay below a certain threshold stays below that threshold. Can you understand that?

I understand that you sure seem to be radically confused.
If I define n as 100, then { 1, 2, 3, ..., n } is as it is. But, you still go around saying that there is a largest natural number. Basically saying they are finite.
Btw, is this you?
https://youtu.be/rVtHrgdcvZA
;^D