Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 09. Jan 2025, 00:42:24
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <d1e9fb6482f30e8a4cde3db97587932cef7cb198@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 08 Jan 2025 15:35:44 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 08.01.2025 12:04, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM formulated on Wednesday :
If ω exists, then ω-1 exists.
Wrong.
A set like ℕ has a fixed number of elements. If ω-1 does not exist, what
is the fixed border of existence?
It has an infinite number of elements, and that number happens to be
invariant under finite subtraction/addition.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.