Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 09.01.2025 02:26, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/8/25 9:40 AM, WM wrote:

On 08.01.2025 13:25, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/8/25 4:06 AM, WM wrote:

On 08.01.2025 00:30, Richard Damon wrote:
>

Except you don't use *EVERY* FISON, only those below some limit n that is below a faction of infinity.

>
Show a FISON that expanded by a factor of 100 or more covers ℕ. Fail!
>

There isn't one, but doesn't need to be.

>
Read your sentence above. Think over its meaning.

 

WHat is wrong with it.

 You claim that I don't use every FISON because I use only those with less than 1 % of |ℕ|. To prove your claim, you must find a larger FISON not belonging to every of mine. You can't. Therefore your claim is wrong.