Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Am 10.01.2025 um 02:19 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 1/9/2025 5:15 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 09.01.2025 um 22:12 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 1/9/2025 8:18 AM, WM wrote:

On 09.01.2025 10:56, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM explained :

>

The set {1, 2, 3, ...} is smaller by one element than the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.

>
Both sets are equal in size

>
No. Both sets appear equal (although everybody can see that they are not) when measured by an insufficient tool.