Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Am Thu, 09 Jan 2025 23:06:47 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 09.01.2025 21:29, joes wrote:

Am Thu, 09 Jan 2025 17:18:16 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 09.01.2025 10:56, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM explained :

>

The set {1, 2, 3, ...} is smaller by one element than the set {0, 1,
2, 3, ...}.

Both sets are equal in size

No. Both sets appear equal (although everybody can see that they are
not) when measured by an insufficient tool.

Nobody said they were equal to each other.

They are said to be in bijection.

Of course every set is bijective to itself.