Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 1/9/25 11:18 AM, WM wrote:

On 09.01.2025 10:56, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM explained :

 

The set {1, 2, 3, ...} is smaller by one element than the set {0, 1, 2, 3, ...}.

>
Both sets are equal in size

 No. Both sets appear equal (although everybody can see that they are not) when measured by an insufficient tool.
 Regards, WM
 

No, you just don't understand how infinity works. YOU have said that infinity doesn't exist, and now you are complaining that it isn't sufficient to describe things?
You are just proving that you "logic" is broken.