Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 10.01.2025 13:41, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/9/25 11:48 AM, WM wrote:

It is true that {1, 2, 3, ...} is a set and {0, 1, 2, 3, ...} is a greater set.

No, one may be the proper subset of the other, but it turns out that due to the way that infinity works, they are both are the same size.

This has nothing to do with "how infinity works". It simply is a result of an insufficient method to measure infinite sets.
Regards, WM