Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 10. Jan 2025, 17:19:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vlrhb0$2m5j$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10.01.2025 13:41, Richard Damon wrote:
On 1/9/25 7:37 AM, WM wrote:
As I said, cardinality cannot describe this difference of one element.
Because the property that "cardinality" describes doesn't have that difference.
So it is. Cardinality cannot describe the difference of one element, not even of infinitely many. Infinite is simply infinite, no matter what the real size is.
You need not understand that. But the claim that different sets like ℕ and ℚ are of same size shows that you have been stultified by set theory.
Regards, WM