Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 10.01.2025 13:41, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/9/25 5:01 PM, WM wrote:

You don't know it. That does not prove its non-existence.

It has no predecessor,

Prove it under the premise of dark numbers.
Investigate what happens when all elements of the set {1, 2, 3, ..., ω} are doubled. Note that the equality of all distances between neighbours remains, as conserved property.
Regards, WM