Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12.01.2025 17:16, joes wrote:

Am Sun, 12 Jan 2025 16:25:15 +0100 schrieb WM:

I am talking about all numbers which Cantor uses for his bijections.
He uses only elements, not sets.

He uses *infinitely* many elements, not finite subsets.

So do I.

"The infinite sequence thus defined has the peculiar property to
contain the positive rational numbers completely"
"thus we get the epitome (ω) of all real algebraic numbers."
For all these numbers my equations are true.

For all numbers n e N

Yes. Otherwise you should find a number that is missing.