Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 12. Jan 2025, 20:39:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vm15pj$18v7t$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12.01.2025 20:33, Jim Burns wrote:
On 1/12/2025 10:54 AM, WM wrote:

No, it depends on completeness.
 It is completely true
that each natural number is a natural number   and
that only natural numbers are natural numbers.
and that nothing fits between them and ω.
ℕ is the set of finite ordinals.
such than none can be added.
Regular distances in (0, ω) multiplied by 2 remain regular distances in (0, 2ω).
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
27 Nov 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1050WM
27 Nov 24 +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
27 Nov 24 i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
28 Nov 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1047Jim Burns
28 Nov 24  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1045WM
28 Nov 24  i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1037joes
28 Nov 24  ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1036WM
28 Nov 24  ii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
28 Nov 24  ii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
28 Nov 24  ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
28 Nov 24  ii i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
28 Nov 24  ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1031FromTheRafters
28 Nov 24  ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1030WM
28 Nov 24  ii   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
29 Nov 24  ii   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
29 Nov 24  ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1027FromTheRafters
29 Nov 24  ii    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1025WM
29 Nov 24  ii    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1024FromTheRafters
29 Nov 24  ii    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1023WM
29 Nov 24  ii    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1022FromTheRafters
30 Nov 24  ii    i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1021WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1020FromTheRafters
30 Nov 24  ii    i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1019WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)10FromTheRafters
30 Nov 24  ii    i      i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6joes
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4joes
30 Nov 24  ii    i      ii   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
1 Dec 24  ii    i      ii    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2joes
1 Dec 24  ii    i      ii     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
30 Nov 24  ii    i      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, infinite-middle)2Ross Finlayson
2 Dec 24  ii    i      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary, infinite-middle)1Chris M. Thomasson
2 Dec 24  ii    i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1008Chris M. Thomasson
2 Dec 24  ii    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)90Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)89Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)84Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)82Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)81Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)80Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)79Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)17Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)16Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i ii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)61Ben Bacarisse
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)59Chris M. Thomasson
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)55Moebius
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)54Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)52Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)51Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)50Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)49FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)48Ben Bacarisse
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)47Moebius
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i     +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)45Ben Bacarisse
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i      +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1FromTheRafters
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)43Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i       +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ben Bacarisse
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)41WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)19joes
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8joes
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)6joes
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i   +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1joes
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Richard Damon
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
7 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4FromTheRafters
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3WM
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2FromTheRafters
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Moebius
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)20Richard Damon
5 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)18WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        ii+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)8Richard Damon
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)5joes
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4WM
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        iii `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Richard Damon
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        ii`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)9Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i i        `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Chris M. Thomasson
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1WM
4 Dec 24  ii    i       i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)3Ben Bacarisse
3 Dec 24  ii    i       i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)4Jim Burns
2 Dec 24  ii    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
2 Dec 24  ii    i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)2Moebius
2 Dec 24  ii    i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)913FromTheRafters
29 Nov 24  ii    `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson
29 Nov 24  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)7Jim Burns
28 Nov 24  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)1Ross Finlayson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal