Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 1/12/25 6:48 AM, WM wrote:

On 11.01.2025 15:09, FromTheRafters wrote:

joes laid this down on his screen :

Am Sat, 11 Jan 2025 11:04:56 +0100 schrieb WM:

 

If Cantor has constructed a sequence containing all even numbers of the
original set ℕ, then the doubled even numbers are missing.

What? Doubled even numbers are also even numbers.

>
He's a hopeless case.

 Yes, you cannot hope ever to understand the difference between potential and actual infinity.

Well, it is clear you can't either, and you have even admitted you don't think they exist, so you are just arguing about something you admit isn't real.

 In actual infinity all numbers are present. No one is missing, according to Cantor. None can be added.
If you multiply every number by 2, then larger even numbers than all hitherto present even numbers are created because the number of numbers remains constant but the odd numbers disappear.
 

Nope, none were added, you just don't understand what infinity is and are so stupid, you can't recognize your own stupidity.

Regards, WM