Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 1/12/25 7:52 AM, WM wrote:

On 11.01.2025 15:15, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/10/25 4:48 PM, WM wrote:

 

You are inconsistent. You claim that all natural numbers are an invariable set. But when all elements are doubled then your set grows, showing it is not inc´variable. That is nonsense.

 

No, the set DOESN'T grow,

 The number of elements does not change. The odd numbers disappear.
 Regards, WM
 

So then, where did the extra numbers come from? Not one was created that didn't exist before.
You have shown you can't name even one of them.
All you are doing is proving that you logic is just a pile of lies.
Until you can actually PROVE your claims by showing the numbers that were created, you are just admitting that you are nothing but a filthy liar that doesn't know what he is talking about.