Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 20. Jan 2025, 15:27:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <ce6e34e2b4ce8bdf498abe3f1e48afd343c2097f@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:29:23 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 19.01.2025 13:32, Richard Damon wrote:
Note, even in actual infinity, every Natural Number has Aleph_0
successors
Then not all could be subtracted from ℕ.
Wrong:
But that is possible ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ...} = { }.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.