Re: x²+4x+5=0

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: x²+4x+5=0
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 24. Jan 2025, 19:01:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn0khr$2bekj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 24.01.2025 um 17:53 schrieb Python:
Le 24/01/2025 à 16:48, Richard Hachel  a écrit :
Le 24/01/2025 à 14:15, FromTheRafters a écrit :
Richard Hachel wrote :

The two imaginary roots are x'=-2-i and x"=-2+i.
>
Shouldn't imaginary roots be on the y axis?
>
Ce ne serait plus résoudre les racines de x, mais les racines de y quand y=0, ce qui est absurde.
Non, non, il s'agit de trouver les racines de x lorsque y=0.
 FromTheRafters was pointing out your misuse of the standard terminology.
 if x,y are real numbers, then x + iy is a complex numbers. The term "imaginary" (in French "imaginaire pur") denotes numbers of the form i*y. They are on the "y axis" refers to the representation of C as coordinates in the Euclidean plane.
 So "-2 - i" and "-2 + i" are not "imaginary".
But RH told us:
"[I] call these imaginary roots, because, since they do not exist, we must imagine them."
:-)

Date Sujet#  Auteur
22 Jan 25 * x²+4x+5=052Richard Hachel
22 Jan 25 +* Re: x²+4x+5=018Chris M. Thomasson
22 Jan 25 i`* Re: x²+4x+5=017Moebius
22 Jan 25 i +- Re: x²+4x+5=01Moebius
22 Jan 25 i `* Re: x²+4x+5=015Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  +* Re: x²+4x+5=013Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  i+* Re: x²+4x+5=08Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  ii`* Re: x²+4x+5=07Moebius
23 Jan 25 i  ii `* Re: x²+4x+5=06Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  ii  `* Re: x²+4x+5=05Moebius
23 Jan 25 i  ii   `* Re: x²+4x+5=04Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  ii    `* Re: x²+4x+5=03Moebius
23 Jan 25 i  ii     `* Re: x²+4x+5=02Moebius
23 Jan 25 i  ii      `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  i`* Re: x²+4x+5=04Moebius
23 Jan 25 i  i `* Re: x²+4x+5=03Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  i  `* Re: x²+4x+5=02Moebius
23 Jan 25 i  i   `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i  `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Moebius
23 Jan 25 +* Re: x²+4x+5=026sobriquet
23 Jan 25 i+- Re: x²+4x+5=01Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 i`* Re: x²+4x+5=024Moebius
24 Jan 25 i `* Re: x²+4x+5=023Richard Hachel
24 Jan 25 i  `* Re: x²+4x+5=022FromTheRafters
24 Jan 25 i   +* Re: x²+4x+5=020Richard Hachel
24 Jan 25 i   i`* Re: x²+4x+5=019Python
24 Jan 25 i   i +* Re: x²+4x+5=05Moebius
24 Jan 25 i   i i+* Re: x²+4x+5=03Richard Hachel
24 Jan 25 i   i ii`* Re: x²+4x+5=02Python
24 Jan 25 i   i ii `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Richard Hachel
24 Jan 25 i   i i`- Re: x²+4x+5=01Python
24 Jan 25 i   i +* Re: x²+4x+5=03Richard Hachel
24 Jan 25 i   i i`* Re: x²+4x+5=02Python
24 Jan 25 i   i i `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Richard Hachel
25 Jan 25 i   i `* Forgotten to answer?10WM
25 Jan 25 i   i  `* Re: Forgotten to answer?9FromTheRafters
26 Jan 25 i   i   `* Re: Forgotten to answer?8WM
26 Jan 25 i   i    +* Re: Forgotten to answer?4FromTheRafters
26 Jan 25 i   i    i`* Re: Forgotten to answer?3WM
26 Jan 25 i   i    i `* Re: Forgotten to answer?2FromTheRafters
26 Jan 25 i   i    i  `- Re: Forgotten to answer?1WM
26 Jan 25 i   i    `* Re: Forgotten to answer?3joes
26 Jan 25 i   i     `* Re: Forgotten to answer?2WM
27 Jan 25 i   i      `- Re: Forgotten to answer?1joes
24 Jan 25 i   `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Chris M. Thomasson
23 Jan 25 +* Re: x²+4x+5=02Richard Hachel
26 Jan 25 i`- Re: x²+4x+5=01Jim Burns
23 Jan 25 `* Re: x²+4x+5=05Peter Fairbrother
23 Jan 25  +* Re: x²+4x+5=02Richard Hachel
23 Jan 25  i`- Re: x²+4x+5=01Peter Fairbrother
2 Feb 25  `* Re: x²+4x+5=02Chris M. Thomasson
3 Feb 25   `- Re: x²+4x+5=01Richard Hachel

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal