Sujet : Re: x²+4x+5=0
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 24. Jan 2025, 22:21:45
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn109a$2dm7q$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/24/2025 5:15 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
Richard Hachel wrote :
Le 23/01/2025 à 22:23, Moebius a écrit :
Am 23.01.2025 um 00:58 schrieb sobriquet:
Op 22/01/2025 om 14:48 schreef Richard Hachel:
x²+4x+5=0
>
This equation has no root, and it never will.
>
We can then find two roots of its mirror curve.
>
Let x'=-3 and x"=-1
What is this imaginary mirror curve?
>
It is the curve with equation y=-x²-4x-3
>
Let's look for its roots, and we find x'=-3 and x'=-1
>
These are the imaginary roots of x²-4x+5.
>
Wolfram Alpha tells us there are two roots:
>
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=solve+x%5E2%2B4x%2B5%3D0
>
Wolfram Alpha must be wrong! :-P
>
>
>
No, here it is fine. The two imaginary roots are x'=-2-i and x"=-2+i
>
But that is not the question.
Shouldn't imaginary roots be on the y axis?
:^) If I were to plot point 0+3i, I would place it at vector point (0, 3) on the canvas.