Re: The set of necessary FISONs

Am Sat, 25 Jan 2025 12:09:56 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 24.01.2025 13:29, Richard Damon wrote:

On 1/24/25 4:41 AM, WM wrote:

On 23.01.2025 13:01, Richard Damon wrote:
>

But There is no single UF(n) that equals N, because you can ony get
there from the union of an infinite set of FISONs.

The union of all FISONs does not cover ℕ. Otherwise Cantor's theorem
would require the existence of a first necessary FISON.

Cantor’s theorem does not force a necessary FISON. We already established
that no finite set of FISONs suffices.
 

you just need to take the union of an infinite number of them.

FISONs enumerate themselves. There is no infinite FISON and hence no
infinite number of them.

What the FUCK that makes NO sense.