Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/28/25 10:29 AM, WM wrote:

On 28.01.2025 14:10, Jim Burns wrote:
 

A set such that a larger FISON does NOT exist
is sufficiently large in order for Bob
to disappear purely from swaps within the set.

 He disappears from visibility.
 

I agree that
your (WM's) actualᵂᴹ infinity does not exist.
>
That's not our infinity.
>

I use Cantors actual infinity: |ℕ| is a fixed quantity larger than all natural numbers. What is your infinity?
 Regards, WM
 

But that is just Aleph_0, and not related to any of yoru "FISON" discussion.
I guess you are just showing you don't undetstand what you are talking about, and are so stupid, you don't see that you don't understand.