Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 29. Jan 2025, 09:34:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vncp6r$29v60$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 28.01.2025 18:18, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM expressed precisely :
On 28.01.2025 11:26, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM expressed precisely :
>
An infinite set of FISONs that has the union ℕ needs a first element.
>
The only needed one would be the last one but there is no last one just like there is no last natural number.
The only needed one would be a FISON that does not obey
|ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo
but
|ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = 0
But it is not existing. Therefore you claim that an infinite set is necessary. But that is pure matheology.
Assume any set of FISONs with uninon U(F(n)) = ℕ. Then every FISON can be dropped as completely useless. Nothing remains. Therefore:
IF U(F(n)) = ℕ THEN ℕ = { }.
FISONs can accomplish only a potentially infinite collection.
Regards, WM