Sujet : Re: The set of necessary FISONs
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 29. Jan 2025, 09:57:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vncqhg$29v5v$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29.01.2025 05:07, Richard Damon wrote:
YOU are the one that says there needs to be a "required" FISON.
If there is an infinite set, then it has a first element. But for every element it is clear that it is useless to get U(F(n)) = ℕ. Hence the claim is nonsense.
Regards, WM