Re: The set of necessary FISONs

On 1/30/25 4:05 AM, WM wrote:

On 29.01.2025 15:00, FromTheRafters wrote:

WM was thinking very hard :

 

It is Cantor's theorem that every set of ordinals has a first element. FISONs are v. Neumann ordinals.

>
Yes, but some infinite sets don't have a first element.

 Every finite or infinite set of ordinals or FISONs has a first element! Other sets are irrelevant in the present context.
 Regards, WM

Right, but the "Set of Neccessary FISONs" isn't actually a set, but just nonsense.
A set that doesn't exist doesn't need to have a first element.
Note, your "logic" you are using here even breaks for simple finite cases.
What is the set of factors of 36: { 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 36}
What is the set of "Neccessary" factors of 36: {}
The lack of a Neceesasary subset doesn't mean the full set doesn't exist, or its goal is impissible.
All you have done is prove your stupidity, and admit that your logic is based on the proven incorrect Naive theories.
That you are too stupid to even see this stupidity puts you at a new low.